AICE Media Studies AS- Kempf, M

Annotated Bibliography

 Question 1: Question 1 on Canva Question 2: Question 2 Prezi Questions 3 and 4: Questions 3 and 4 Google Presentation

 

 Editing was not as daunting a task as I had expected.  Today, I took another look at my magazine. I am satisfied with the small edits I made, as stated in the previous blog post.  Overall, I am content with my magazine but there are certain aspects I wish were different.  Particularly, I think my paintings could have been a bit cleaner and more true to how I am used to painting rather than how I tried to for this project. I think they may have turned out better had I tried to paint more natural beauty, flora and fauna.  People is my weakness and I should have addressed that earlier.  However, I enjoyed parts of the experience of making it.  This includes what I learned from the interview and writing the article.   I also think I could have been more creative and used my strengths to make it a better product but time and uncertainty harmed it.  However, I am glad to be able to share Cultureprism.  

 The editing I had to do was quite simple and I was able to get back into my project with a new perspective after presenting it.   First, I heeded the advice of changing the color of the masthead.  I had wanted to keep it green because that is a significant color for this issue of the magazine but I did agree it needed to stand out more.  So I changed it to a darker green and changed "May" to the lighter, brighter green.  I also changed the Issue number to simply the year so as to have room and I thought it better represented the issue. I played around with where to put 'May' and '2021' but I thought it looked best framing the masthead rather than listed down the page.  I was glad to make the tagline larger and get that across as well.   I also fixed the spacing on the Contents page and removed the 'Mat 2021', per the reminder that it was redundant.  It definitely made it look more clean and it was relieving to space out the sections....